Rovvi.dev field manual · Businesses · Advisors · Project Managers
Updated August 13, 2026Customer delivery reference

Turn an AI idea into a controlled delivery

A customer reference for understanding who owns each decision, what information makes a phase priceable, how funding aligns with work, and which evidence closes a phase.

A business owner, AI Advisor, and neutral Project Manager work around a plan with four protected milestones
Three distinct roles, one visible plan, and evidence at every gate.

The published delivery model at a glance

4distinct parties

Business, Advisor, Project Manager, and Rovvi each have a defined role.

6delivery stages

The published sequence runs from a defined outcome through signed close.

8pricing inputs

A bounded phase records outcome, boundary, owner, inputs, evidence, safety, timing, and change rules.

4close gates

Scope, evidence, safety, and written sign-off must all be visible.

01 · Role map

Four roles with separate decision rights

The Business, AI Advisor, and Project Manager form the operating team. Rovvi supplies the platform, matching, and payment administration.

Choose

Business

Owns: Outcome, priorities, budget, acceptance

Must prove: The result solves the real business need

Build

AI Advisor

Owns: Technical design, implementation, testing, evidence

Must prove: The deliverable works as agreed

Coordinate

Project Manager

Owns: Definition of done, plan, cadence, risks, sign-off

Must prove: Decisions are clear and the phase stays controlled

Protect

Rovvi

Owns: Platform, matching, and payment administration

Must prove: The agreed workflow and payment controls are available

Decision-rights matrix
DecisionBusinessAdvisorPM
Business priorityDecidesAdvisesClarifies
Technical methodInformedDecidesChallenges assumptions
Definition of doneApprovesConfirms feasibilityDrafts and maintains
AcceptanceDecidesSupplies evidenceRecords sign-off

02 · Protected delivery sequence

Money and work move through the same six gates

Under Rovvi’s published engagement structure, each funded phase is bounded enough to understand and meaningful enough to verify.

  1. 01

    Define

    One observable outcome and its boundary are recorded.

  2. 02

    Agree

    Owners, evidence, price, timing, and change rules are documented.

  3. 03

    Fund

    The bounded phase is funded before implementation begins.

  4. 04

    Build

    The Advisor works in increments and shares delivery evidence.

  5. 05

    Verify

    Evidence is compared with the agreed definition of done.

  6. 06

    Close

    Both sides sign off; funds release and the change is recorded.

03 · Phase record

Eight facts make a phase understandable and priceable

These are the data fields a customer should expect to see in a bounded phase record. Missing information signals that the phase needs clarification before pricing.

01

Outcome

The observable capability a real user receives at the end of the phase.

02

Boundary

The work and behavior explicitly excluded from the phase price.

03

Owner

The person authorized to make the final business decision.

04

Inputs

The data, systems, access, and people required for delivery.

05

Evidence

The artifact used to demonstrate that the outcome is complete.

06

Safety

The approvals required before external or irreversible actions.

07

Timing

The dates and dependencies that control delivery.

08

Change

The method used to estimate and approve requests outside the boundary.

04 · Phase close data

Four visible gates replace a vague percentage complete

The project agreement model makes close readiness inspectable. This is a process definition—not a Rovvi-generated performance rating.

1

Scope

The delivered result fits the agreed boundary.

2

Evidence

The named proof exists and can be inspected.

3

Safety

Approvals, access, privacy, and rollback were handled.

4

Sign-off

Open issues are resolved, deferred, or accepted in writing.

05 · Governance comparison

Human approval is essential—but approval without validation has blind spots

This chart compares a common human-only approval model with the AuthorityGate KeyStone reference architecture. It does not claim that every current governance program lacks validation. It isolates the specific case where a person is the only control between changing vendors, changing AI behavior, and an external action.

Control coverage by change sourceQualitative architecture comparison—not a measured product benchmark.
Change or control
Human control only, without validation
AuthorityGate KeyStone reference model
Human intentWhat should happen?
Primary control

A person interprets the request and decides whether to approve.

Still primary

The human owns purpose, acceptable risk, exceptions, and consequential approval.

Vendor changeAPI, tool, scope, pricing, or terms drift
Reactive

The reviewer must notice the change in documentation or changed behavior.

Validate first

Connector identity, declared capability, schema, scope, and expected contract are checked before action.

AI changeModel, prompt, policy, or output drift
Sample-based

The person judges the output they can see; hidden behavior changes may appear after approval.

Conformance gate

Approved model/configuration, required fields, policy rules, and acceptance tests must still match.

AuthorityWhat may this run change?
Inferred

Permission is often implied by tool access or a broad “go ahead.”

Declared envelope

Actor, target, action, data boundary, amount, duration, and expiry are evaluated as explicit constraints.

Failure behaviorWhat happens when facts are missing?
Human-dependent

The result depends on whether the reviewer notices uncertainty and stops.

Fail closed

Missing evidence, changed contracts, stale approval, or an out-of-bound action blocks execution and requests a new decision.

EvidenceWhat proves the decision and result?
Conversation record

Approval may exist as a message or memory without the exact inputs, version, and resulting state.

Decision receipt

The request, policy/version, validation result, human decision, execution identity, and read-back are linked.

Human-only governance

Human reviewOne control must notice every kind of drift
No independent validation layer
AI changesModel · prompt · policy · output
Vendor changesAPI · tools · scopes · terms

AuthorityGate KeyStone

Human decisionIntent · risk · exceptions · final authority
Evidence receiptDecision, execution, and read-back stay linked
Runtime authority boundaryOnly the approved actor, target, action, and time
ValidationContract · schema · policy · version · acceptance tests
AI changesModel · prompt · policy · output
Vendor changesAPI · tools · scopes · terms

Scope note: This is the proposed AuthorityGate KeyStone governance architecture supplied for this manual. No public product specification or independent benchmark was available to verify implementation or performance, so the chart makes no certification, coverage-percentage, or risk-reduction claim.

06 · Risk response

Approval strength rises with impact and irreversibility

This map shows the response a customer should expect as a proposed change becomes harder to reverse or more consequential.

What happens when a phase drifts

  1. New work pauses.
  2. The original outcome is restated.
  3. Defects are separated from new scope.
  4. The change becomes a separately estimated decision.
  5. The approved boundary and decision owner are recorded.

07 · Answer desk

Frequently asked delivery questions

Who owns the business outcome?

The business owns priorities, budget, acceptance, and the final business decision. The Advisor owns the technical approach and evidence. The Project Manager keeps the engagement clear and moving.

What should a good phase contain?

One observable outcome, an explicit definition of done, a bounded price and schedule, named evidence, and a sign-off decision.

When should work begin?

Begin a phase after its scope is agreed, the agreement is signed, and that phase is funded. This keeps expectations and payment protection aligned.

What counts as delivery evidence?

Use proof appropriate to the outcome: a working link, test result, screen recording, before-and-after report, repository change, runbook, or customer acceptance note.

What does AuthorityGate KeyStone add to human approval?

In the reference architecture shown here, KeyStone adds machine-enforced validation before execution: a declared authority boundary, vendor and model conformance checks, policy tests, fail-closed handling, and an evidence receipt. The human still owns intent, exceptions, and the final consequential decision.